Archive for the ‘006256. Thomas Swann’ Category

Colonial Surry

27 May 2009 Leave a comment

Source: John D. Boddie, Colonial Surry (Baltimore: Clearfield Company, 1989).

[page 93]

The following persons shown below were appointed “Viewers of Tobacco” in 1639.  These persons were required to view the tobacco fields and see whether or not the laws governing the planting and growing of tobacco were being observed.

The penalty for planting tobacco out of the prescribed season (after July first) was a heavy fine.  All tobacco leaves on the ground were to be burned.  Any hidden tobacco was to be confiscated.  A person finding same or informing about same was to receive one-half of the tobacco, the other half was to be burned.  The object of such strict regulations was to prevent an over-production and the raising of an inferior quality.  It was hoped by these means to maintain a high price for tobacco.  (V.M. 5, p. 120, 274, 277.)



James City County

South Side


From Smith’s Fort to Grindall’s Hill,

Mr. Thomas SWAN, John BISHOP, William MILLS.

[page 96]

A great Indian Massacre occurred in 1644, instigated by old Opecanough of former massacre fame, who though still alive was so feeble he could not lift his eyelids.  When it was necessary for him to see, an attendant raised them.  Notwithstanding his feebleness he still cherished his implacable hatred of the English.

Governor BERKELEY, alarmed by the spreading civil war in England, had ordered that Good Friday, April 18, 1644, be kept as a special day of fasting and prayer for the King.

However, upon Opecanough’s orders, on Holy Thursday, the Indians fell upon the outlying settlements and from 300 to 500 persons perished under their tomahawks.

The Assembly in 1644 provided that the county of Surry and other counties shall prosecute the enemy and defend those parts from “Upper Chipoake downward” by constant marches upon the enemy.

An Act was passed defraying the charges of the Pamunkey and Chickahominy march against the enemy.  Captain SHEPARD and Mr. SWAN were to raise 50 men, in Surry.  In all 300 men were to be raised for the march to Pamunkey.

For better measure of defense against the Indians, the Assembly in March 1645-46, enacted “that 45 soldiers be raised to garrison Fort Henry on the Appomattox, and that 45 soldiers be raised from the inhabitants of Basse’s Choice upwards including the said Basse’ Choice (In Isle of Wight).  All of which soldiers shall be raised by the Lieutenants and deputy Lieutenants within the said limits either by impressment or otherwise, Surry to finish 15 men.” […]

[page 97]

[…] Colonel Thomas SWAN and Colonel John FLOOD also appeared in the Assembly of November 1645, from James City.  They were both residing then on the Surry side.

Colonel SWAN was also Burgess from James City in 1649 and from Surry, 1657-58.  In 1659, he was appointed a member of the Council which place he held until his death in 1680.

[page 99]

In 1666, William BATTE witnessed a deed in Surry from Nathan STANTON to Captain Thomas SWANN (B. 1, p. 281).

[page 101]

Several communities in the United States have claimed that their particular place was the “Birthplace of Freedom” because early in colonial times its citizens made protests against the payment of unjust and burdensome taxes.

We wish to advance the claim of Lawne’s Creek Parish Church in Surry county as the “Birthplace of Freedom” in America for some of its parishioners met there on December 12, 1673 “to declare they would not pay their public taxes.”

There was no freedom of assembly in those days and this unusual and unauthorized meeting alarmed the authorities.  Two Justices of the County Court, by virtue of an English statute nearly 300 years old which empowered Justices to inquire into such “Riots”, ordered the sheriff to arrest these “seditious” people and bring them before the court for trial.

This was only a prelude to Bacon’s Rebellion in 1676.  Governor BERKELEY was America’s first modern dictator.  It will be noted in the following chapter on the Rebellion, that his methods of obtaining absolute rule was somewhat like that of Huey LONG’s and governors of other states to whom subservient legislatures gave autocratic powers.

America’s freedom was not won by a single stroke.  It was of slow growth, as typified by this and other like protests made from time to time, until it finally burst forth in a greater rebellion than BACON’s, the American Revolution.

But let us get along with the story.  On January 3, 1673-74, following the gathering at Lawne’s Creek Church, Lawrence BAKER and Robert SPENCER, Justices of the County Court issued the following writ which was recorded January 13, 1673: (Bk. 2, p. 40.)  “Of how dangerous consequence unlawful assemblies and meetings have been is evident by the chronicles of our native country which are occasioned by a giddy headed multitude, and unless restrained may prove the ruin of a country, and therefore we, LAWRENCE BAKER and ROBERT SPENCER, two of ye justices of this county, being informed that on about the 12th of December last past, a company of seditious and rude people to the

[page 102]

number of 14 did unlawfully assemble at the Parish Church of Lawne’s Creek, with intent to declare they would not pay their public taxes, and they expected divers others to meet them, who failing they did not put their wicked designs in execution, and for the good law made against Rogues and Riots and particularly the Statute of 13 Henry IV, chapter 7, and injoining Justices to inquire of such meetings, we therefore sent our warrant to the Sheriff of this county to Cause,

Matthew SWAN
William TOOKE
Thomas CLAY
Robert LACY
William LITTLE

to appear before us, yet the said persons not being satisfied with the former unlawful meeting, did this day, the greatest part of them meet together in ye old field called ‘Devil’s Old Field’, and as we justly suspect did confederate not to discover who were the first instigators or moved them to their unlawful assembling as afore and we upon their examination to find they have unanimously agreed to justify their meetings, persisting in the same as appears by the open declaring of Roger DELKE that if one suffers they would all burn, and we find their contemptuous behavior and carriage not respecting authority; have therefore committed ye persons aforesaid to the custody of the Sheriff, until they find security for their appearance at the next County Court and also for keeping the peace which we conceive consonant tot he law in such cases, and ye mutinous persons aforesaid being so many in number.  We have by Virtue of the Statute of ye 2d of Henry 5th command ye aide and assistance of several of the neighborhood for their security.  Given under our hands the day and year aforesaid.”  (Book 2, p. 40.)

Many of the above fourteen men were respectable landowners.  Matthew SWAN was perhaps related to Col. Thomas SWANN, one of the most prominent men in the county at the time and a member of the Council.  William TOOKE was the son of James TOOKE of Isle of Wight County, who had served in the House of Burgesses.  Thomas CLAY was connected with the family of John and William CORKER, burgesses and prominent in the early history of the county.  John BARNES was a Quaker and a fairly prosperous man, who later married Mr. TOOKE’s widow.  William HANCOCK married Elizabeth, daughter of Nicholas SPENCER, and a relative of the same Capt. Robert SPENCER who caused his arrest.

[page 103]

Roger DELKE was the son of Roger DELKE, Sr., who had been Burgess for Stanley Hundred in the session of 1632-33.  John GREGORY was the step-father of Roger DELKE, Jr., as he had married Alice DELKE, his mother.

The depositions of all fourteen of the above men are recorded immediately after the above warrant from Capts. SPENCER and BAKER (id., pp. 40-41).  That of James CHESSETT was the first:  “James CHESSETT being this day at ye house of Capt. Law. BAKER & coming with Thirteen psons who were summoned to appeare there to give an acct. of theire Rioutous or unlawful Assemblying att ye Church of Lawnes Creek on ye 12th Xbr. Last, & for yt ye sd CHESSETT was not summoned, but comeing with ye Rest, he was brought before us ye subscribed, & being asked who gave him notice to come with ye Rest, he said he came of his own Simple head; he was also asked if he was of them yt mett at ye Church, he Answered ‘yes’, he being (asked?) why he invited Geo. PEETRS to yt meeting, he said it was to see his neighbors, soe yt he seemes premptorily to give an acct. of ye first pmoter or Instigator of that meeting.”

He was followed by Roger DELKE who “being this day brought before us the subscribed, and complaint being made to us by William SHERWOOD, sub sheriff of this county, the said DELKE did this day say that ‘we will burne all before one shall suffer.’  Ye said DELKE acknowledged he said ye same words, and being asked why they met at the church he said by reason their taxes were so unjust and they would not pay it.  He was demanded who was the person that invited him to meet, he peremptorily denied; but ye said DELKE on his own behalf and on behalf of the others then met did declare their meeting was to be relieved from payment of Drams and Cyder which they never had.  All the rest assented to what he said save only Michael UPCHURCH.”

Robert LACY then deposed that William HANCOCK took him to the meeting at the Devil’s Field, though he was warned to the contrary, and that John BARNES, Michael UPCHURCH, John GREENE and John SHEPPARD were also there.  He also said that he was at the meeting at the church, about which John SHEPPARD told him.  Thomas CLAY deposed that William HANCOCK told him of the meeting and was the first to tell him that the levies were unreasonable.  William HANCOCK denied who told him of the meeting, “very obstinately persisting.”

George PETERS testified that James CHESSETT asked him to go to the

[page 104]

church.  Then Michael UPCHURCH denied who told him of the meeting or that he knew of the business they met about.

Matthew SWAN’s testimony was as follows:  “Matthew SWAN being this day brought before us the subscribed and being asked why he and others met at the Church, the 12th Xber, last, he said it was to agree about a redress from their taxes which were heavy.  He was asked how he knew their taxes were unreasonably laid, he said Mr. MASON (Francis MASON, one of the justices) told him and also Mr. GORING said the same, and that there were some extraordinary taxes, he being demanded what discourse he and Mr. GORING had about the meeting, he said Mr. GORING said he would be there if he did not go from home, and the said SWAN have also very obstinately persisted in the Lawlessness of the meeting, and said that all or most of the Country were of his mind.”

John GREENE in his deposition denied who instigated him to go to meeting.  William LITTLE said that he went with John BARNES, but denied who instigated him to go.  John SHEPPARD agreed with the others to meet at the church “to be redressed from their Levys”; he said that he heard from Samuel CORNELL that the levies were unjust, and that CORNELL said Mr. HOLT (i.e., Randall HOLT) told him so.

John BARNES then being called denied who said first that the levies were unreasonable and said that he heard it from everybody.  William TOOKE also denied knowing who said first that the levies were unreasonable.

The examination was concluded by the deposition of Francis TAYLOR, a person not involved.  “The deposition of Francis TAYLOR being called before Capt. Law. BAKER, Mr. Robert CAUFIELD, and Capt. Robert SPENCER to swear his true knowledge concerning a meeting of some of the Parish on Friday 12 Xbr., 1673, at Lawne’s Creek Parish Church is as follows:  “That being at my lodging — looking out I espyed John GREGORY going through the Field, and called him to desire him to make me a waistcoate, which he told me he would, but he asked me if I would not be at the Church for there was to be a great part of the Parish meeting there this morning concerning ye Levys.  I told him I knew nothing of it, neither was I concerned in it, as being no housekeeper, but I did not much care if I went with him to see what was done.  He told me he was going to Mr. CAUFIELD’s to take measure of one of his men, to make his freedom clothes and he would holler for me as he came back, which accordingly he did and we went together.

When we came there we found about halfe a score men sitting there,

[page 105]

and asking them how they did, and what they met for they said they did expect some more to come intending civilly to treate concerning the Levy for they did understand that there was several officers to be paid tobacco out of the Levy, which they knew no reason for, by reason they were put to as much trouble and expense as they were.  Colonel SWAN was to have 5000 lbs. tbco. for the officers and the Colonel was to be levied on this parish only.  Their company not meeting yet they stayed there about an hour, and so resolved to speake about it on the next Sabbath being sermon day.  In the Interior on Saturday, I being at Mr. SHERWOOD’s (the sub-sheriff) requested him to see the list of the Levy which he did show me and there I saw the charge was levied on the whole county.  Which I spoke of at the Church, they hearing said no more, and further saith not.”  (Book 2, pp. 42-3.)

This simple meeting of citizens to complain about their taxes seems to be a “tempest in a tea pot” from a 20th century standpoint.  However, it appears to have been regarded as an extremely serious matter in 17th century Virginia under BERKELEY’s autocratic rule.

The case was speedily disposed of as follows at a court held for Surry County January 6, 1673/4 (O.B. 1671-90, p. 42):  “for that they were sorry for their offence & were no projectors of ye same, John GREGORY, Robert LACY, James CHESSETT, Thos. CLAY, Michll UPCHURCH, Wm. TOOKE, Wm. LITTLE and John GREENE be ordered committed until they give bond for their future good behaviour and pay costs and be dismist.”  (George PETERS seems to have been unintentionally omitted from the above list.)  John  BARNES, John SHEPPARD, and William HANCOCK were ordered to “be committed untill they give ye like bond and pay each of them one Thousand pounds tobo. fine, to ye use of his Majesty, and pay costs.”  Roger DELKE “altho he were noe Ring Leader in ye faction, yet for saying after much fair admonicon yt if one of them suffered they would burne all, he shall stand Comitted untell he give ye Like bond and pay ye Like fine of 1000 pds. of tobo. wth costs.” … “& for ye sd Mathew SWAN was a Chief projector of ye design & being asked if he were Convinced & said yt ye Cort had unjustly proceeded in ye sd Levy & Charged ye Cort therewth at ye Barr, it is therefore order’d that he stand Comitted untell he give bond for his good abearing wth security for his appearance at ye 3’d day of ye next Genrall Cort before ye Right Honourable ye Governour & Councell for his Dangerous Contempt & Unlawful project & his wicked Prsisting in ye same; & being called again one by one & strictly

[page 106]

Examined how & by whome ye sd unlawfull Assembly was projected & sett on foot; it appearing yt ye sd Mathew SWAN, Jno. BARNES, Jno. SHEPPARD and Wm. HANCOCK at ye house of ye sd Jno. BARNES did first resolve & conclude upon ye meeting & yt ye rest (with a great many more whome they intended to prsuade were only drawne on from ye beginning).”

The case of Matthew SWAN was finally brought before the Council and General Court of Virginia on the afternoon of April 6, 1674 and settled as follows:  “It is ordered that the order of Surry Court Against the mutinuss Psons he Confirmed and that Mathew SWAN the ringleader of them, who was bound over to the Court be Fined Two Thousand pounds of tobacco and Caske and that all fines of the Psons goe towards the ffort at James Citty And that they pay all Just Costs and Charges.”  (Minutes of Council and General Court, p. 367.)

This, however, did not end the matter, for there is always a court of public opinion to which even dictators sometimes bow.  This action caused so much resentment among the colonists that Governor BERKELEY found it advisable to remit the fines which he finally did on September 23, 1674.  (W.M. 23, p. 122.)

It is significant that these events occurred a full two years before the outbreak of the Rebellion, and the case indicates the discontent of the people and their sullen attitude toward their rulers.  Only Lawnes Creek Parish men were involved in the above.  When the actual rebellion broke out, most of those involved with BACON — in fact, a very large majority — were inhabitants of Southwark, the other parish in Surry.  Perhaps the spirit of the Lawnes Creek men had been broken by the condemnation of Matthew SWAN and his colleagues.

Matthew SWAN, the ringleader of this protest against high taxes, has many descendants in Virginia and the South.  In 1675 he married Mrs. Mary SPILTIMBER, widow of Anthony SPILTIMBER and daughter of Robert HARRIS.  His will was dated December 14, 1702 and probated Jan. 5, 1702/[3?].  He mentioned daughter, Elizabeth, wife of John DREW, daughter, Sarah; Elizabeth, daughter of John DREW; son-in-law John DREW; daughter, Mary, wife of William PHILLIPS; and grandson, John PHILLIPS.  Executors were John DREW and Sarah SWANN.  Witnesses were Arthur ALLEN, William CHAMBERS, John ALLEN, and Robert RUFFIN.

[page 107]


I.   Elizabeth, m. (1) John DREW, d. 1703.  (See DREW.)  (2) John SUGARS.  (No children.)

II.  Mary, m. William PHILLIPS of Surry County, Va., who in his will dated Feb. 14, 1720/21, probated April 19, 1721, mentioned wife, Mary; sons, John, William, Swann, and Mathew PHILLIPS (the three last named under 16 years f age); and daughters, Anne, Mary, and Elizabeth PHILLIPS.  Executors were wife, Mary, and sons, William and Swann PHILLIPS.  Witnesses:  Joseph WATTELL, William NEWSUM, Carter CRAFFORD.

III. Sarah, m. Carter CRAFFORD (1682?-1743).  (See CRAFFORD.)

[page 109]

Due to the disturbances of 1676, no list of tithables for Surry County is recorded for that year.  The list of 1675 (Book 2, pp. 92-4), however, gives us some idea of the state of the county at the time of the outbreak of the rebellion […] Only 30 negro slaves appear among the tithables of 1675 in the whole county, although there may have been a few more, as Mr. Benjamin HARRISON’s list for part of Southwark Parish does not specify the character of the tithables, and the same is true for a few other households in other sections of the county.  As far as the list of 1675 shows, negroes were owned only by Col. Thomas SWANN, Major William BROWNE, John PULISTONE, Francis MASON and Nicholas MERIWETHER in Southwark Parish […]

[page 110]

[…] Judging from the tithables, as well as other records, the wealthiest men in Southwark Parish appear to have been Lieut.-Col. George JORDAN, Attorney-General of Virginia, with 7 tithable servants; Rev. William THOMPSON, the minister, with 6 white servants; Col. Thomas SWANN, Member of the Council, with 3 white servants and 2 negro slaves; and Francis MASON, with 6 white servants and 7 negroes in Southwark, and 2 negroes in Lawnes Creek […] In Lawne’s Creek Parish […] [o]thers fairly well-to-do were: […] Capt. Samuel SWANN (son of Col. Thomas SWANN) […]

[page 111]

The real rulers of the county in 1676 were practically identical  with the wealthier men.  The two most prominent persons were Col. Thomas SWANN, Member of the Governor’s Council, and Lieutenant Colonel George JORDAN, Attorney-General of Virginia.  Both were elderly men, Col. SWANN being 60 years of age […] The justices, in order of their appointment to the Commission, were as follows:  Lieutenant-Colonel George JORDAN, Capt. Lawrence BAKER, Major William BROWNE, Capt. Charles BARHAM, Mr. Robert CAUFIELD, Capt. Robert SPENCER, Mr. Benjamin HARRISON, Mr. Nicholas MERIWETHER, Capt. Samuel SWANN, Mr. Arthur ALLEN, and Mr. Francis MASON.  They and their families had long been powers in the county […] Capt. Samuel SWANN was the son of Col. Thomas SWANN […] It appears that during the critical last days of the Rebellion they all remained faithful to Governor BERKELEY (with the possible doubtful exception of the two SWANNs), as the Governor on March 31, 1677

[page 112]

reappointed them all to office, naming on the Quorum Col. JORDAN, Capt. BAKER and Major BROWNE (who were apparently already on it), and adding to the Quorum Robert CAUFIELD in place of Capt. SWANN, and Arthur ALLEN, now called Captain ALLEN (Book 2, p. 120) […] Capt. Samuel SWANN was High Sheriff in 1676, and John SOLWAY, owner of the Warren House, was Sub-Sheriff (O.B. 1671-90, p. 125).  Rev. William THOMPSON was minister of Southwark Parish, and probably also of Lawnes Creek […]

We have mentioned that the deep-seated cause of the movement known as Bacon’s Rebellion was economic and political.  The immediate cause of its outbreak in 1676 was a series of Indian raids on outlying settlements in 1675.  Governor BERKELEY had himself taken the field against the Indians in the wars thirty years before, and the colonists appealed to him now for aid.  The Governor, however, had a profitable fur trade monopoly with the Indians which brought him a large income and which he did not wish to disturb.  He was appealed to early in 1676, but refused to declare war, postponing any action till the meeting of an Assembly which he called in March, 1675/6.  The Indian raids grew worse, and by March it is said that over 300 whites had been massacred by the savages, and indignation with the Governor ran high, particularly in the border counties of Stafford in the north, and Henrico and Charles City in the south and west.  When the Assembly met in March, it remained subservient to the Governor, and limited its action to levying 500 men from the counties for military service and ordering the construction of nine forts for the protection of the colonists.  They were to be erected on the Potomac in Stafford County, the Rappahannock in Gloucester County, the Mattapony in New Kent County, at Mahixon on the Pamunkey River in York County, on the James River in James City County, and Appomattox in Charles City County, the Black Water in Surry County, at Currawaugh probably in Nansemond County, and in Accomac County on the Eastern Shore.  Most of these

[page 113]

forts appear to have been perfectly useless for the purpose in hand, as there seems to have been no danger from the Indians in many of the locations.  In this regard, the building of the Accomac fort seems especially ridiculous, and so were several of the others.  Even in the border counties, the people claimed that the forts gave them no real protection, and later on it was claimed that in many cases the contractors, who were BERKELEY’s favorites, embezzled the money and even failed to build the forts, or left them unfinished.  The people in the border counties needed a punitive expedition against the Indians to protect them, but BERKELEY and the Assembly forbade any such attack on the enemy without the Governor’s specific order, which he was not likely to give.  As a climax, two million pounds of tobacco were added to the people’s taxes for building these forts, which they felt to be useless.

Surry’s Burgesses in this Assembly were the old ones, George JORDAN and Lawrence BAKER.  For the fort in Surry County the order was for “fforty men in the county of Surry to be garrisoned at one ffort or defenceable place neare Richard ATKINS upon the black water in the same county of Surry, of which ffort captain Roger POTTER to be captain or chiefe commander” (Hening Statutes, II, p. 318).  180 pounds of powder and 440 pounds of shot were ordered to the Black Water fort (id., p. 329), and Col. Thomas SWAN and Lt.-Col. George JORDAN were ordered to make choice of the garrison and impress the men and provisions for the fort (id., p. 330).  One wonders as to the identity of these men, and whether any of them later followed BACON.  It is interesting to note that exactly forty men received the act of pardon in Surry County, February 6, 1676/7, and that they were nearly all from Southwark Parish, where the fort was located.  It is probable that this was one of the useless forts.  There were Indians to the far south in Surry, but we find no record that they were making trouble.  This is indicated, also, by the fact that the appropriation for ammunition for the Black Water fort was the smallest of all the nine with the single exception of that on Currawaugh Swamp in Isle of Wight or Nansemond County.  The trouble in Surry was not with the Indians, but was economic and political.

[page 118]

[…] On August 3, 1676 he [Nathaniel BACON] assembled at the house of Major Otho THORPE in York County as many of the prominent men of the colony as he could gather, and after exerting some pressure on them, secured the signatures of sixty-nine of them to the following document (Eggleston Manuscripts, pp. 36-38, Calendar of Transcripts, Va. Dept. of Archives):

Declaration of the people of Virginia concerning the adherence with BACON.

“Whereas the country hath raised an Army against our common Enemies the Indians and putt the same under the Command of Nathaniel BACON Esqr Generall, being upon the point to march forth against the said common Enemy, hath been diverted, and necessitated to move, tot he suppressing of forces, by evill disposed psons raised agt the said Generll BACON, purposely to foment and stirr up civill warre amongst us, to the ruine of his Majties Country; and whereas it is notoriously manifest, that Sr Wm BERKELEY knt Governr of ye Country, assisted, councelled, and abetted by those evill disposed psons aforesaid, hath actually commanded, fomented and stirred up the people tot he said civill warre, and failing of success herein, hath with drawn himself to the great astonishment of the people, and unsettlement of the Country; and whereas the said Army raised by the Countrie for the causes aforesaid are drawn downe, and remain full of dissatisfaction in the middle of the Country, expecting attempts from the designes of the said Governour, and his evill Councillours aforesaid; and noe proper means found out for the settlement of the distractions within and preventing the horrible outrages, and murders daily committed in many pts of the Country by the barbarous Enemy.

It hath been thought fitt by the said Generall, to call unto him all such sober and discreete Gentlemen: as the short exigence of ye dis-

[page 119]

tracted condition of the Country would admitt to the middle plantation, to consult and advice the settling of the peace of that Country, and the Gentleman of this 3d day of August 1676 accordingly have mett, and in order to the said settlement doe advice, resolve, and declare, and conclude, and for ourselves doe swear in manner following.

First that we will at all times joine wth the sd Nathaneel BACON his Army, against the Common Enemy in all points whatsoever.

Whereas certain psons have lately contrived and designed the raising of forces agt the said Generall, and the Army under his command, thereby to begett a civill warre.  We will endeavour the discovery and apprehending of all, & every those evill disposed psons, and then for to secure them, till farther order from the said Generall.

And whereas it is credibly reported, that the Governr hath informed the King’s Maty yt ye said Generall and the people of the Country in Armes under his command, their aiders and abettors are rebelling and removed from their Allegiance, and this and such information, hee the said Governr hath advised and petitioned the King, to send forces tor educe them; Wee doe farther declare beleive in our consciences, that it consists with the wellfare of his Maties Countree, and yt it is consistent wth our Allegiance to his most sacred Maty for us and every one of us the Inhabitants of Virginia to oppose, and suppresse all force whatsoever of that nature, untill such time as the king and his Councell be fully enformed of the States of the Case, by such pson or psons shall be sent from the said Nathaneel BACON Genll, in the behalf of the people; and the determination thereof to be remitted hither.  And we doe swear yt we will him the said Generall and the Army under his command, aid, and assist accordingly.”

The first two signatures affixed to the above declaration are those of Thomas SWAN and George JORDAN.  It is uncertain whether there were any other representatives of Surry County among these sixty-nine men, among whom were included Councillors and Burgesses, as well as BACON’s chief political advisers […]

[page 120]

Col. JORDAN and the other possible Surry representatives to this meeting seem to have gone home by the following day, August 4.  However, Col. SWANN remained and his is again the first signature to the following somewhat more extreme declaration signed by only twenty-nine gentlemen on that date (id., pp. 39-41):

“Whereas certain informations is now made, that the Ammunition at the fort of Tindalls point is commanded away and putt aboard a ketch, and yt ye great quantity of arms are removed & carried away out of Glocestr County, and from Mr. Secretaries house at Richneck, and that certain psons in contempt of the Authority of Nathaneel BACON Esqr Generll appointed over the forces for the Indian warre, are in open hostility in the County of Westmoreland and the fort on the head of Rappahanack River; not surrendred to the said Generlls Command, And whereas it is much doubted, that severall psons lately fled, and also such as they can stirr up and arms with the Ammunition aforesaid, will fall in amongst some of the Northern Counties, or other defensible places to the diverting the forces aforesaid, from the defence of the Country, and engaging the Country in a civill warre, which threatens the utter ruine of this Country, if the same be not timely prevented.  And whereas the said Generall hath demanded Concell, and advice of us the Subscribers, what is fitt in this Exigence to be done, to prevent the universall ruine impending the distracted Country.  Wee doe advise and request the said Generall, that as soon as may bee an Assembly may be summoned by some precepts or othr warrants or writts directed to the Counties from Some Gentlemen of ye Councell.  And that in the meantime the civill Administracon of Justice may remain constant, & run in the same course and Channell as formerly, and that the Subscriptions made yesterday by the Gentlemen then summoned and mett together, there at the middle plantation to consult ye settling of the present distractions of the Country, bee sent to all the Counties in the Country, and yt ye said Generall authorize fitting psons in those Counties, to take the said Subscriptions, and administer the said Oath.  and lastly that the Generall and forces under him efectually prosecute as well the Indian warre, as by all meanes and waies oppose, suppresse, and wth open hostility prosecute all manner of psons whatsoever, their Confederates, Councellors, aidors, and abettors, that doe or hereafter shall combine, conspire, or attempt agt ye sd Generall, or his the forces under his Command, or that shall

[page 121]

disturb or raise tumults or otherwise impeach the domestick peace and Safety of the Country.”

“Given at the middle Plantation aforesaid, this 4th of August 1676.”

On August 11, 1676 Nathaniel BACON, with the four members of the Governor’s Council who had signed the “Declaration” of August 3, namely, Thomas SWANN, Thomas BEALE, Thomas BALLARD and James BRAY, sent a proclamation to the Sheriff of Westmoreland County, stating that since Governor BERKELEY had absented himself from the government, he was under their authority to proceed to call an election of two representatives from Westmoreland to sit in a new assembly of the House of Burgesses, to meet at James City on September 4th, 1676.  (Sainsbury Abstracts, Vol. XVI, p. 29.)

During the month of August, both the authorities and the common people of Surry County appear to have been thoroughly Baconian.  Due probably to the prestige of Cols. SWANN and JORDAN, the following entries appear in the Order Book (1671-90) on pages 131 and 132:

“  August 10, 1676

Present Lt. Coll. JORDAN
Mr. CAUFIELD } Mr. MASON } Coms.

At a meeting of ye Cort at Southwarke this day to Setle ye Com. in peace, according to ye Comand of ye Honoble Genll & having reced a Comand from him this day to pvide bread for our pporcion of three hundred men for a month, for ye Countrys service In pformance of ye sd Comand of ye Honble Nath. BACON Esqr Genll  It is Ordrd ytt every mr. of a family doe forthwith provide ffoure pds of good sound bisquett for every tithable in his ffamaley, and yt ye Mill do lay all private Grinding aside untill this be done, & yt all ye housekeeprs. in ye lower pish doe Carry in yr. pporcion of bread to ye House of Capt. Arthur LONG, & all those in ye uper Pish to Carry their pporcion to ye house of Mr Wm THOMPSON, they being desired to receive & serve ye same, & yt it be all brought in to ye sd places by Thursday next being ye 17th Instant & this ordr to be forthwth published through ye County.

Vera Recordtur              Test  W E Cl Cur.”

[page 122]

It is noteworthy  that all the Justices were present on this occasion save only Capts. BAKER and SWANN.  Col. Thomas SWANN sat with a Commission composed of Lt.-Col. JORDAN, Major BROWNE, Capt. SWANN, Mr. CAUFIELD, and Capt. SPENCER, on August 24, 1676, to enact the following order (p. 132):

“In Order and Obedience to the Genll Ordr, It is Ordered that Every Master of a family in this county doe forthwith provide five pounds & a halfe of good sufficient Biskett for Every tithable pson in his ffamily, (also for Every tithable two pds & a halfe of dryed beefe or bacon if they have it, but if they have it not the said beefe or bacon, then they are to pay for theire pporcon to those psons that shall provide it) — the said Bread & meate being for our pporcon of two months provisions for our Souldrs undr the Comand of the sd Genll According to Act of Assembly, It is also ordered all the tithables below Ware Neck carry their pvissions to the Houses of Capt. Charles BARHAM & Mr. Francis MASON, & all above Ware Neck to the houses of Major Wm BROWNE & Doctor Nathll KNIGHT, who are requested to receive & serve the same.”

Surry County so far seems to have been united.  We now come to the turbulent days of mid-September, 1676, when BERKELEY’s and BACON’s forces clashed in open war, and Surry County, like many others was split between Berkeleians and Baconians.  Early in September, when BACON and his wearied troops returned from the expedition against the Pamunkey Indians in the swamps of what is now King and Queen County, he found that BERKELEY had by a ruse captured the small fleet sent against him, and himself embarking with troops on a number of ships, had reentered and seized Jamestown on September 7th or 8th.  BACON hastened to the capital city and laid seige to it.  Between September 15th and 18th (the exact chronology is difficult to follow), BERKELEY’s troops finally sallied out of town and attacked BACON’s forces, but were defeated and withdrew in confusion.  The Governor, finding he could not rely on his troops, became disheartened, and sending word to a number of the ruling class on both sides the river that all was lost, secretly embarked in the night, and with a large number of the wealthier people, took refuge a second time on the Eastern Shore.  On September 19th BACON entered Jamestown, and feeling that it was not defensible against ships, burned it to the ground, that it might not again become a stronghold of the Governor and his fleet.  At the same time

[page 123]

his followers seized and occupied strategic buildings (usually the homes of wealthier planters) in the various counties, and took over the county governments.  Thus BACON and his men, now distinguished more prominently than ever as “the poor” in contradiction to “the rich”, became absolute masters of most of Virginia.

In Surry County we are told that “all the great ones” went away with BERKELEY on this second flight, leaving the county to BACON’s men, with the exception of Col. Thomas SWANN, who apparently remained calmly at his home at “Swann’s Point.”  It is probable, also, that Col. SWANN’s son, Capt. Thomas SWANN, remained in the county.  We have mentioned that Col. SWANN signed both “Declarations”  in favor of BACON early in August.  His son, Capt. SWANN, was the son-in-law of William DRUMMOND, a Scottish gentleman who lived at Jamestown, who had once been Governor of North Carolina, who was one of BACON’s most ardent supporters and best advisers, and who was finally executed in a brutal manner and his family terribly persecuted by Governor BERKELEY after his final victory.  Col. SWANN was certainly suspected by some of Baconian partisanship, as indicated by the following deposition of Alice MARRIOTT, wife of Matthias MARRIOTT and daughter of Thomas WARREN, builder of the “Warren House” and former Burgess from Surry (Book 2, p. 149):

“Deposition of Alice MARRIOTT, aged 32 years, or thereabouts, sworne saith:

“That about the middle of last Febry your deponent being at the house of William FOREMAN, in the company of William FOREMAN and his wife, Lawrence MEIZLE, Katherine WITHERINGTON made answers that the great ones went all away and left the poor ones and they were forced to do what they did.  No said Thomas HIGH, ‘the Great Toad tarried behind’, and one of the company asked Thomas HIGH who he meant by ‘the Great Toad’.  He replied he meant Coll. SWANN, the old rebel and traitor, your deponent knows not which.  Your deponent made answer she never heard Coll. SWANN did meddle or make in the late troubles.  ‘No’ said he, when Coll. SWANN sent a note to Mr. BISHOP by Christopher FOSTER to raise men and come down with them to stop the Governor’s men, the horses, saddles and bridles of ours would have been taken had it not been for Colonel SWANN.

[page 124]

“Katherine WITHERINGTON made answer again that he might hold his tongue for his saddle was saved by her sister, and further your deponent did hear Thomas HIGH say that SWAN did send for a boate load of apples from Mr. MASONs, for that he thought Mr. MASON would never come again.  That Thomas HIGH said Coll. SWANN did sit in the Council of War for burning the town and when the Governor went away from town he sent for Coll SWANN but he would not come to him.  As soon as BACON came to towne he would take a boate and go over to him and he hoped Coll. SWANN would be plucked bare.

“Sworne Nov. 15, 1677.”

Much of the above is probably malicious slander by Thomas HIGH, who had formerly been one of BACON’s men.  It is true, however, that Col. SWANN did stay in the county, and that he did not allow himself to be thrown into a panic by BERKELEY.  The county might have been better off had more of the prominent men stayed at home.  As it is, we are not certain that literally all the Justices and officials left with BERKELEY.  The only ones of whom we are certain are Arthur ALLEN, Robert CAUFIELD, John SOLWAY, and Francis MASON, who later prosecuted a number of people for seizing their houses during the Rebellion and appropriating their property.  Probably others went, too.  Col. SWANN did not suffer for his conduct later on.  When the Royal Commissioners arrived in Virginia late in January 1676/7, to investigate the rebellion and make a report to the King, the Governor refused to entertain them at his home, “Green Spring”, in James City County (Jamestown being destroyed), and Col. SWANN offered them the hospitality of his home at Swann’s Point across the river, which they made their headquarters during their stay in the colony.  In the Minutes of the Council of Trade and Plantations, at a meeting held at Whitehall December 6, 1677 it was recommended that certain “rash and fiery men” be excluded from the Governor’s Council of Virginia, but that Col. SWANN be continued in office.  It was also mentioned that the Governor refused to receive His Majesty’s Commissioners into his home, and recommended that “Col. SWAN be recommended to Col. JEFFREYS (the new Governor) for some reward for his kindness and expense in doing so” (Calendar of Transcripts, Va. Dept. of Archives, Vol. XVII, Sainsbury Transcripts, pp. 99-100).  One rather admires Col. SWANN’s calmness and levelheadedness, which is also illustrated by the following testimony of

[page 125]

Christopher FOSTER, Col. JORDAN’s nephew, given November 15, 1677 when he was twenty-seven years of age (Book 2, p. 149):

“That being at Coll SWANNs house about ye same day ye late Governor Sr Wm BERKELEY Sallied out of Towne, Coll. SWANN thinking ye County being in some danger of ye upland men did desire yr. depont. to goe up to Mr. BUSBY’s & to see whether there was any guard kept there or noe & withall to tell Mr. BUSBY he would speake with him, but when yr. depont. Came there he found noe body at Mr. BUSBY’s home but Mrs. BUSBY a woman or two more, & Wm PICKERALL a lame man, and further saith not.”

One wonders from the above deposition what had happened to Lieut. BUSBY and the guard at his house.

[page 132]

By January 11, 1676/7 BERKELEY was once more in complete control of the colony.  On that date he began a series of court-martials, which resulted in the death of a large number of chief rebels and caused

[page 133]

Charles II later on to exclaim that “the old fool had executed more men than he himself had caused to die for the death of his father, Charles I.”  One of the men executed during this period in a peculiarly brutal manner was William DRUMMOND, father-in-law of Capt. Samuel SWANN.  After the execution, DRUMMOND’s wife and children were driven from their home and almost perished in the swamps of James City County.

Categories: 006256. Thomas Swann

Adventurers of Purse and Person, Virginia

19 May 2008 Leave a comment

Source: Virginia M. Meyer and John Frederick Dorman, editors, Adventurers of Purse and Person, Virginia, 1607-1624/5, 3rd edition (Richmond: Dietz Press, 1987).

[page 9]

[MUSTERS of the Inhabitants of Virginia 1624/5.]

[4] Neck-of-land Charles City


THOMAS HARRIS aged 38 yeares in the Prosperous in May

ADRIA his wife aged 23 yeares in the Marmaduke in November 1621

ANN WOODLASE theire kinswoman age 7 yeares

[page 10]


ELIZABETH        aged 15 yeares in the Margaret & John 1620

PROVISIONS: Corne, 7½ bushells; Pease, 1 bushell.  ARMES & MUNITION: Powder, 11 lb.; Lead, 2; Peeces fixt, 3; Armour, 1; Coat of Male, 1; Sword, 1.  CATTELL & POULTRIE: Cattell young and old, 11; Poultrie, 30.HOUSES AND BOATS: Houses, 2; Boats, 1.

[page 354]

HARRIS (Thomas)1

+*1. THOMAS1 HARRIS, Gent., subscriber to the Second Charter issued 23 May 1609,2 came to Virginia before 1616 and is believed to have arrived, 1611, aboard the Prosperous “in May.” Listed as an Ancient Planter, he was settled, 1623/4, with his wife at Neck of Land, Charles City.3 His muster there, 1624/5, listed him as aged 38, his first wife *Adria, aged 23, who came in the Marmaduke, Nov. 1621, and Ann WOODLASE, “their kinswoman aged 7.”

1 William Glover Stanard, Chart of Some of the Descendants of Captain Thomas HARRIS of Henrico County who Came to Virginia in 1611 (Richmond, 1893); William Daniel LIGON, The LIGON Family and Connections (n.p., 1947), pp. ix, 306-83, 844; V IV. pp. 248-49; V VII, p. 204; Malcolm Hart Harris, “Three William HARRISes in Hanover County,” The Virginia Genealogist, XXII, pp. 187-93; William R. Taylor, “Evidence of the Descent of William4 HARRIS of Goochland Co., Va., and his Father William3 HARRIS of Henrico, New Kent, Hanover and Louisa Cos., Va., from Maj. William2 HARRIS son of Capt. Thomas1 HARRIS of Jamestown,” The Virginia Genealogist, XXII, pp. 261-70.

2 Br. Gen. p. 913.

3 Hotten, p. 170; CP I, p. xxxiv.

[page 355]

Land originally assigned HARRIS within Diggs Hundred (later Bermuda Hundred), of record 11 Nov. 1635 for 750 acres, lay “southward upon the land of Edward VIRGANY [GURGANEY] and thence extending Northward upon the land of Joane his [second] wife…,” 100 acres due him as being an Ancient Planter on order of the late Treasurer and Company, 18 Nov. 1618, and 650 acres due for transportation of 13 persons.4

Thomas1 HARRIS came into possession of the GURGANEY land by 2 May 16365 and repatented the 700 acres included in this tract in Henrico, 12 July 1637, “called by the name of Longfield, with swamp and marshes … southeast towards Bremoes devident … 400 acres granted unto Edward GURGANEY by order of the Court, 1 October 1617 … and bequeathed by Ann GURGANEY, widdowe of the said Edward, to Thomas HARRIS as by her last will dated 11 February 1619 [1619/20].”6 In a second renewal of the patent for “Longfield,” 25 Feb. 1638/9, HARRIS claimed 100 acres in the name of his “first wife Adry HARRIS, being an Ancient Planter.”7 These facts suggest that Adria perhaps was the daughter of Edward and Ann GURGANEY and that her passage, 1621, on the Marmaduke,8 was a return trip to Virginia rather than an initial voyage. Adria had died by 11 Sept. 1626 when Rebecca GRAYE testified in court that Goodwife WRIGHT, a suspected witch, had told Thomas HARRIS he “should burie his first wiefe being then betrothed unto him (which cam so to pass).”9

HARRIS served as Burgess for the Neck of Land, 1624, for Henrico, 1640, 1647-48,10 was appointed, Aug. 1626, as one of the “Commissioners for the Upper Parts,” which included Henrico, and in Dec. 1640 was Commander of Henrico County.11 His will, now lost, was made about 1649.12

He married (1) Adria, perhaps GURGANEY, and (2), after 1625, Joane —-.13

Issue: (by 1) 2. MARY2; (by 2) 3. WILLIAM2.

4 Patent Bk. 1, p. 304.

5 Ibid., p. 337.

6 Ibid., p. 438.

7 Ibid., p. 615.

8 The Marmaduke brought over, 1621, a number of “maids for wives,” but Adria was not listed among them.

9 MCGC, p. 111.

10 Leonard, pp. 5, 18, 26.

11 MCGC, pp. 106, 476.

12 Waverly K. Winfree, The Laws of Virginia (Richmond, 1971), pp. 344-47. This Act of Assembly passed at the session of 21 May-9 July 1730 to break the entail on part of the land “formerly called Longfield but lately called and known by the Name of Curles,” states that Thomas1 HARRIS left an only daughter, Mary, wife of Thomas LIGON, and an only son, William HARRIS, and details the LIGON descendants.

13 LIGON, op. cit., p. 843, without citing proof, states that she was Joane OSBORNE.

[page 356]

2. MARY2 HARRIS (Thomas1) deposed 2 Dec. 1684 that she was aged about 64.14 She married, by 1649,15 Thomas LIGON, who was baptized 11 Jan. 1623/4 at Sowe, Warwickshire, the eldest son of Thomas LYGON (about 1577-1626) and his (2) wife Elizabeth PRATT (1602-1631).16 He came to Virginia in the 1640s, was Burgess for Henrico, 165617 and was lieutenant colonel of militia and surveyor of Henrico County until his death.18 Thomas LIGON left a will, now lost, 10 Jan. 1675/6-16 March 1675/6.19 Mary made an agreement with her brother Maj. William2 HARRIS that he should have the “whole profits of the surveyor’s place” until her eldest son should come of age and half of the profits thereafter. Testimony as to this agreement was recorded 1 Nov. 1679.20 By deed of gift, 29 April 1691, Mary2 (HARRIS) LIGON conveyed to her “loving sons, Richard LIGON and Hugh LIGON,” 200 acres lying in Curles, Henrico County, “being part of a greater divident granted unto Captain Thomas HARRIS deceased and given by will of said Thomas HARRIS to his daughter Mary LIGON,” to be equally divided between them.21 Mary LYGON, Senr., left a will 18 April 1703/3-1 Feb. 1703/4.22

Issue: [LIGON]23 4. Thomas3, born about 1651, died before 20 Aug. 1678, unmarried;24 5. WILLIAM3; 6. JOHAN3; 7. RICHARD3; 8. Matthew3, born about 1659, died before 1 May 1689, without issue:25 9. Hugh3, born about 1661, held 150 acres in Henrico County, 1704, married (1), 1688-89, Elizabeth WALTHALL, orphan daughter of William WALTHALL,26 and (2), between June 1711

14 Henrico Co. Deeds & Wills 1688-97, p. 107. Since she was not named in the muster, 1624/5, she was probably closer to age 60.

15 Winfree, op. cit., p. 345.

16 Michael J. Wood and Gary Boyd Roberts, “Four Thomas LYGONs,” The Virginia Genealogist, XXII, pp. 253, 255.

17 Leonard, p. 33.

18 Ligon, op. cit., pp. ix, 306-18.

19 Henrico Co. Order Bk. 1678-93, p. 167; Wills & Deeds 1677-92, p. 35.

20 Henrico Co. Wills & Deeds 1677-92, p. 109.

21 Henrico Co. Deeds & Wills 1688-97, pp. 231-32. The title to this land was finally settled, 1 Nov. 1706, by equal division between Matthew4 LIGON, son of Richard, and William4 LIGON, as heir of his brother Thomas4, son and heir of William3 LIGON (Henrico Co. Wills & Deeds 1706-09, pp. 4-7).

22 Henrico Co. Wills & Deeds 1697-1704, p. 366.

23 The mother’s will names sons Richard and Hugh, deceased son William, daughters Johan, wife of Robert HANCOCK, and Mrs. Thomas FARRAR and some grandchildren. Children Richard, Matthew, Hugh and Mary are mentioned 20 Aug. 1678 (Henrico Co. Orphans Court Bk. 1677-1739, p. 3). Sons Thomas, William, Richard and Hugh are mentioned, 1730 (Winfree, op. cit., p. 345).

24 Henrico Co. Orphans Court Bk. 1677-1739, p. 3.

25 Henrico Co. Order Bk. 1678-93, p. 369.

26 Henrico Co. Deeds & Wills 1688-97, pp. 97, 158; Malcolm Elmore WALTHALL, “The WALTHALL Family” (typewritten; Richmond, 1963), p. 7.

[page 357]

and Dec. 1713,27 Jane (PEW) PRICE, widow of 6. John3 PRICE (see PRICE), but had no known issue; 10. MARY3.

3. WILLIAM2 HARRIS (Thomas1), born about 1629, was heir to “Longfield,” later known as “Curles.” His inheritance of the plantation is established through a suit, John BROADNAX against William SOANE, 1 Oct. 1700, to clear title to the land and establish boundaries.28 He served as a justice of Henrico, Burgess for Henrico, 1652, 1653, 1656, 1658,29 and major of militia of Henrico and Charles City. On 3 Oct. 1670 he was ordered paid £25 “for his Srvice in the Westerne discovery.”30 He left will 20 April 1678-1 Feb. 1678/9,31 but was dead by 7 Oct. 1678 when the inventory of his estate was ordered made.32

He married (1) —– and (2) Alice —–, whose (2) husband, George ALVES (died 173433), of New Kent County, in a suit, April 1683, concerning her son’s indenture, is named as having married the “relict of Major William HARRIS deceased.”34 Alice took her sons to New Kent County.

Issue: (by 1) 11. Thomas3, unmarried, left will 10 Feb. 1678/9-2 June 1679;35 (by 2) 12. WILLIAM3; 13. EDWARD3; 14. Love3.

5. WILLIAM3 LIGON (Mary2 HARRIS, Thomas1), born about 1653, was a major of militia. On 2 April 1682 he “set up his name at the Court Door and thereby published his intentions for England.”36 He married Mary TANNER, daughter of Joseph TANNER and his wife Mary (who later married Gilbert PLATT). On 1 April 1679 Mrs. PLATT made a deed of gift to her daughter Mary, wife of Mr. William LYGON.37 Mary PLATT’s will, dated 10 March 1699/1700,38 named daughter Mary LIGGON and grandchildren Thomas, Joseph, Phebe and Lucretia LIGGON.

27 Henrico Co. Wills & Deeds 1710-14, pp. 189-90, will of John3 PRICE; ibid., p. 115, deed from Hugh and Jane LIGON to John4 PRICE.

28 Henrico Co. Order Bk. 1694-1701, p. 286.

29 Leonard, pp. 30-31, 33-34.

30 JHB 1658/9-1693, p. 55. Lt. LIGGON, not identified by given name, was ordered paid £10.

31 Henrico Co. Wills & Deeds 1677-92, p. 68.

32 Ibid., p. 107.

33 Hanover Co. Record Bk. 1733-35, p. 203, reference, 4 March 1734/5, to George ALVES, “lately deceased.”

34 Henrico Co. Order Bk. 1678-93, pp. 137, 139.

35 Henrico Co. Wills & Deeds 1677-92, pp. 90-91. The will was witnessed by Alice HARRIS, his step-mother, and by Richard3 LIGON and his wife Mary, and named “cozen Richard LIGON” a legatee. The HARRIS land “at the Ware [Weir]”, left to Thomas3 by his father, was devised to “my sister-in-law [half-sister] Love HARRIS.” This was part of a patent for 1202 acres, 7 Sept. 1671, to Maj. William2 HARRIS (Patent Bk. 6, p. 496).

36 Henrico Co. Wills & Deeds 1677-92, p. 241.

37 Ibid., p. 87.

38 Henrico Co. Wills & Deeds 1697-1704, p. 202.

[page 358]

William3 LIGON left will 21 Jan. 1688-1 Aug. 1689.39 His widow Mary and daughter-in-law Elizabeth (as widow of the heir at law) were jointly charged with 1341 acres on the 1704 quit rent roll of Henrico County. Mary (TANNER) LIGON married (2), 1707, as his (2) wife 5. William2 FARRAR (see FARRAR).

Issue: [LIGON] 15. Thomas4, died before 2 April 1705 when administration of his estate was granted to his wife,40 married, 2 Feb. 1697/8,41 Elizabeth WORSHAM who married (2), by 20 Aug. 1706,42 Alexander MARSHALL; 16. William4, aged 59 in Oct. 1741,43 of Prince Edward and Amelia Counties, left will 22 Oct. 1759-27 Sept. 1764,44 married Elizabeth BATTE;45 17. John4, married —–; 18. Joseph4; 19. Sarah4, married 32. Henry4 LIGON; 20. Mary4, married (1), 15 July 1698,36 William ANDERSON, and (2), by 1 Jan. 1716/7,47 Peter ROWLETT of Bristol Parish who left will 5 Jan. 1749/50-4 May 1750;48 21. Phebe4; 22. Lucretia4, posthumous.

6. JOHAN3 LIGON (Mary2 HARRIS, Thomas1) deposed 1 Oct. 1683 as wife of Robert HANCOCK that she was about 30 years old.49 HANCOCK received a deed of gift from his mother-in-law Mrs. Mary LIGON, 2 Feb. 1684/5,50 and held 860 acres in Henrico County, 1704. He left a will, 18 Oct. 1708-1 March 1708/9,51 and Johan HANCOCK left a will, 22 Sept. 1726-7 Nov. 1726.52

Issue: [HANCOCK] 23. William4; 24. Robert4, living 1729,53 married, by 2 Feb. 1712/3. Margaret —–;54 25. Sarah4, married, 1688-89,55 Arthur MOSELEY, Jr., born 1655, who held 450 acres in Henrico County, 1704, married (2) 16. Elizabeth (COX) JAMESTON (see COXE) and left will 22 Feb. 1728/9-6 July 1730;56 26. Mary4, married, by 1 June 1708 when her father deeded them 100 acres,57 John HATCHER who held 215 acres in Henrico County, 1704, and

39 Henrico Co. Deeds & Wills 1688-97, p. 75.

40 Henrico Co. Deeds & Wills 1697-1705, p. 450.

41 Henrico Co. Deeds &c 1697-99, p. 96.

42 Henrico Co. Orphans Court Bk. 1677-1739, p. 49.

43 R.T. Barton, Virginia Colonial Decisions (Boston, 1909), II, p. B150.

44 Amelia Co. Will Bk. 2X, p. 75.

45 Prince George Co. Wills & Deeds 1713-28, pp. 471, 485.

46 Henrico Co. Wills & Deeds 1697-1705, p. 124.

47 Henrico Co. Wills & Deeds 1714-18, p. 137.

48 Chesterfield Co. Will Bk. 1, p. 45; Order Bk. 1, p. 44.

49 Henrico Co. Wills & Deeds 1677-92, p. 254.

50 Ibid., p. 296.

51 Henrico Co. Wills & Deeds 1706-09, p. 152.

52 Henrico Co. Wills & Deeds 1725-37, p. 70.

53 Ibid., p. 234.

54 Henrico Co. Wills & Deeds 1710-14, pp. 186, 189.

55 Henrico Co. Deeds & Wills 1688-97, p. 97.

56 Henrico Co. Wills & Deeds 1725-37, p. 272.

57 Henrico Co. Wills & Deeds 1706-09, p. 94.

[page 359]

was living on Pamlico River, Edgecombe Co., N.C., 25 June 1736, when he sold land deeded to him by his father Edward HATCHER;58 27. Johan4, given 200 acres by her father, 1 June 1708,59 married, 5 April 1700,60 Samuel HANCOCK, carpenter, who held 100 acres in Henrico County, 1704, and left will 1 Sept. 1760-6 Feb. 1761;61 28. Phoebe4, married (1) Thomas BAILEY of Varina Parish who held 251 acres in Henrico County, 1704, and left will dated 21 Dec. 1723,62 and (2) Nicholas GILES;63 29. Elizabeth4, married 23. John Sutton4 FARRAR (see FARRAR).

7. RICHARD3 LIGON (Mary2 HARRIS, Thomas1), deposed 1 Dec. 1693 he was aged 26 or 27.64 Upon coming of age he assumed his father’s place as surveyor of Henrico County, according to the agreement made with his uncle. On 8 May 1704 he petitioned the Assembly requesting that he be restored to the place of surveyor, from which he had been suspended, 26 Aug. 1703, and again, 19 April 1705, he petitioned the Assembly for an allowance for surveying the land (5,040 acres) appropriated for the use of the French refugees at Manakintown who had come to Virginia, 1700.65 He held 1028 acres in Henrico County, 1704. His will, now lost, was presented by his executor, Mathew LIGON, 2 March 1723/4.66

He married, between 20 Aug. 1678 and 1 April 1681, Mary WORSHAM, daughter of William and Elizabeth (?LITTLEBURY) WORSHAM.67

Issue: [LIGON] 30. Matthew4, of Cumberland County, left will 1 April 1764-14 Sept. 1764,68 married Elizabeth ANDERSON;69 31. Richard, Jr., to whom with Matthew4 LIGON a patent for 290 acres in Henrico County was signed in the General Court, Oct. 1706, under survey of 15 March 1705/6;70 32. Henry4, of Prince Edward

58 Henrico Co. Wills & Deeds 1725-37, p. 664.

59 Henrico Co. Wills & Deeds 1706-09, p. 94.

60 Henrico Co. Wills & Deeds 1697-1704, p. 220.

61 Chesterfield Co. Will Bk. 1, p. 377; Order Bk. 3, p. 112.

62 Henrico Co. Miscellaneous Court Records 1650-1807, II, p. 576.

63 Henrico Co. Wills & Deeds 1737-46, p. 330, sale, 6 Dec. 1747, of Phoebe’s dower in the land of Thomas BAILEY, her late husband.

64 Henrico Co. Deeds & Wills 1688-97, transcript, p. 450.

65 JHB, 1702-1712, pp. 78, 89.

66 Henrico Co. Minute Bk. 1719-24, p. 318.

67 Henrico Co. Orphans Court Bk. 1677-1739, p. 2; Wills & Deeds 1677-92, p. 164; V XXXV, p. 48.

68 Cumberland Co. Will Bk. 1, p. 299.

69 Prince George Co. Wills & Deeds 1713-28, p. 232, will of Mathew ANDERSON, Jr., 25 Feb. 1717/8-10 June 1718.

70 Louis des Cognets, English Duplicates of Lost Virginia Records (n.p., 1958), pp. 82, 85. The patent now of record is dated 22 Jan. 1718/9, however (Patent Bk. 10, p. 409).

[page 360]

County, left will 10 Nov. 1759-14 Dec. 1769,71 married his cousin 19. Sarah4 LIGON, who left will 2 July 1784-Jan. 1785;72 33. Sarah4, married, by 1 June 1708,73 Richard GRILLS, who moved to North Carolina and left will 1 Feb. 1719/20-4 April 1720;74 34. Mary4, married Capt. John COLEMAN who, Dec. 1688, chose his brother Robert as his guardian,75 owned 200 acres in Prince George County, 1704, which he and his wife Mary sold 8 May 1725,76 purchasing, 13 May 1725, 185 acres on Whipponock Creek,77 which fell into Dinwiddie County, 1752.

10. MARY3 LIGON (Mary2 HARRIS, Thomas1), born about 1663, married 6. Thomas3 FARRAR and died before 1686 when he remarried.

Issue: see FARRAR….

71 Prince Edward Co. Will Bk. 1, pp. 52-53.

72 Ibid., pp. 351-53.

73 Henrico Co. Order Bk. 1707-09, p. 46.

74 J. Bryan Grimes, Abstracts of North Carolina Wills (Raleigh, 1910), p. 144.

75 Charles City Co. Order Bk. 1687-95, p. 180.

76 Prince George Co. Wills & Deeds 1713-28, p. 834.

77 Ibid., p. 798.

[page 594]


William SWANN who, 5 Nov. 1635, patented 1200 acres in James City County on the south side of James River, west from Smith’s Mount to the half way Necke,1 naming among the headrights Jon. SWAN and Edwd. SWAN, and died 28 Feb. 1637/8 in his 52nd year,2 has been stated to be identical with a Mr. William SWAYNE who was listed, 23 June 1620, along with Messrs. Arthur, Thomas and William SWAYNE, as allowed each a share of stock in the Virginia Company which had been transferred to them by Sir Thomas GATES.3 In 1621 Mr. Arthur SWAYNE and associates were arranging to transport and settle 100 persons in Virginia and, 20 Dec. 1624, the arrival in Virginia of the Flyinge Harte of Flushing, sent out by Mr. Arthur SWAYNE, William CONSTABLE and others, was announced.4

Although the name of Arthur SWAYNE is once written in the records of the Virginia Company as SWANN, no evidence is known to establish that William SWANN who patented land in Virginia in 1635 is identical with a William SWAYNE who held a share in the Virginia Company.  Since there is a difference of five years between the age at death of William SWANN as stated in the family register and the baptismal record of William SWAYNE who was a member of the Virginia Company, identity with that man seems unlikely.  If there were two William SWAYNEs who were members of the Virginia Company, the possibility that the other man was the Virginia settler exists, but no connection between the SWAYNEs, who were London merchants, and the SWANN family of Southfleet and Denton, Kent, has been established.  The son and grandson of William SWANN of Virginia used the arms of this Kentish family.

William Glover Stanard in listing members of the Virginia Council5 stated that Thomas SWANN of “Swann’s Point,” Surry County, was born in Virginia.  No evidence has been found to confirm this statement, and thus to establish that William SWANN was in Virginia

1 Patent Bk. 1, p. 293.  This patent was renewed, 10 March 1638/9, by Thomas SWANN as due in right of “his late father William SWAN” (ibid., p. 625).

2 Family record, compiled by Samuel SWANN (1653-1707), owned in 1919 by a descendant in North Carolina, V XXVIII, pp. 30-32.  He was buried at “Swann’s Point,” Surry County, beside his (1) wife.

3 R, Va. Co. I, p. 372; III, p. 61.  Whether the two William SWAYNEs were the same or different persons is not indicated.  The last three apparently were the William, baptized 11 Feb. 1581/2, Thomas, baptized 1 Jan. 1587/8, and Arthur SWAYNE, baptized 21 Nov. 1591, sons of Edward SWAYNE, whose marriage to Elizabeth METHWOLD occurred 3 April 1581 (A.W. Hughes Clarke, ed., The Register of St. Lawrence Jewry, London, 1538-1676, pt. 1 [London, 1940], pp. 18-19, 21, 23).

4 R, Va. Co. I, pp. 534, 561; IV, p. 567.

5 William Glover Stanard, Virginia Colonial Register (Albany, N.Y., 1902), p. 38.

[page 595]

at the time of the birth of his son Thomas in May 1616.  Additional evidence is needed to prove William SWANN’s residence in Virginia before 1625.